real 5.0 and 3.7 dyno numbers

**fazm** · **real 5.0 and 3.7 dyno numbers -** 03-26-2010

http://wot.motortrend.com/6659607/au...v-6/index.html

a lot more believable if you ask me.

5.0 377.99rwhp 351.44rwtq

3.7 268.06rwhp 259.9rwtq

**fazm** · 03-26-2010

oh and this sounds promising

"
Of course, the best news we discovered on Friday we can only hint at. We believe those dyno figures just have to be accurate, given the outrageous numbers these two 'Stangs threw down at our test track. But you'll have to check back with us bright and early Monday morning to find those out... "

**bscottie** · 03-26-2010

I think:

V6 = 13.2ish

GT = 12.6ish,

my $ .02!

**fazm** · 03-26-2010

with the power to weight on the 6 i would say a best of 13.6, but im betting on 13.7

the gt's power to weight can be as low as a 12.3 though

**tonyw** · 03-26-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by bscottie

I think:

V6 = 13.2ish

GT = 12.6ish,

my $ .02!

I hope but I doubt it. I think the gt might run a 12.9 but the 6 will be low low 14s possibly a 13.9.

**fazm** · 03-26-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonyw

I hope but I doubt it. I think the gt might run a 12.9 but the 6 will be low low 14s possibly a 13.9.

the 2010 gt with 3.73s can run 13.2's (someone on s197 did it), im sure an additional 97hp, and better gearing will get it a lot more than 3 tenths

**Flapjack** · 03-26-2010

The numbers on the 5.0 are very interesting. When you add the typical 15% for drivetrain losses, the V6 comes in almost exactly as advertised. When you add in the 15% for the GT, you get roughly 444 flywheel HP. The V6 comes in around 315 flywheel.

These are just guestimates and all, but that's a pretty big spread for the GT. I would've expected to dyno closer to 350 RWHP on an auto.

**fazm** · 03-26-2010

the best thing is the auto gt will smoke the auto camaro. more hp, less weight.

the m6's will be closer, same power, less weight for the mustang, should be close

**Mwood** · 03-27-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by fazm

the best thing is the auto gt will smoke the auto camaro. more hp, less weight.

the m6's will be closer, same power, less weight for the mustang, should be close

m6? BMW?

**fazm** · 03-27-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mwood

m6? BMW?

sure if todd's behind the wheel....

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

	(#1)
fazm The Collective is a way of life!!! Offline Posts: 6,048 Real Name: David Thanks: 1 Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Arizona Age: 29	real 5.0 and 3.7 dyno numbers - 03-26-2010 http://wot.motortrend.com/6659607/au...v-6/index.html a lot more believable if you ask me. 5.0 377.99rwhp 351.44rwtq 3.7 268.06rwhp 259.9rwtq 1st 400+rwhp stock longblock 410rwhp/459rwtq @ 12psi 12.29 @ 113 @ 9psi New car 2011 mustang v6 6speed manual. red again.

	(#2)
fazm The Collective is a way of life!!! Offline Posts: 6,048 Real Name: David Thanks: 1 Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Arizona Age: 29	03-26-2010 oh and this sounds promising " Of course, the best news we discovered on Friday we can only hint at. We believe those dyno figures just have to be accurate, given the outrageous numbers these two 'Stangs threw down at our test track. But you'll have to check back with us bright and early Monday morning to find those out... " 1st 400+rwhp stock longblock 410rwhp/459rwtq @ 12psi 12.29 @ 113 @ 9psi New car 2011 mustang v6 6speed manual. red again.

	(#3)
bscottie Just Livin The Dream! Offline Posts: 4,141 Real Name: Bill Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Join Date: May 2006 Location: Southern California! Age: 48	03-26-2010 I think: V6 = 13.2ish GT = 12.6ish, my $ .02!

	(#4)
fazm The Collective is a way of life!!! Offline Posts: 6,048 Real Name: David Thanks: 1 Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Arizona Age: 29	03-26-2010 with the power to weight on the 6 i would say a best of 13.6, but im betting on 13.7 the gt's power to weight can be as low as a 12.3 though 1st 400+rwhp stock longblock 410rwhp/459rwtq @ 12psi 12.29 @ 113 @ 9psi New car 2011 mustang v6 6speed manual. red again.

	(#7)
Flapjack The Green Monster Online Posts: 4,451 Real Name: Chris Thanks: 0 Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Colorado Springs, CO Age: 37	03-26-2010 The numbers on the 5.0 are very interesting. When you add the typical 15% for drivetrain losses, the V6 comes in almost exactly as advertised. When you add in the 15% for the GT, you get roughly 444 flywheel HP. The V6 comes in around 315 flywheel. These are just guestimates and all, but that's a pretty big spread for the GT. I would've expected to dyno closer to 350 RWHP on an auto. 2005 Legend Lime 5.4L 3v 14psi: 802 rwhp/789 rwtq , 21psi: 1018 rwhp/988 rwtq TurboHP TT Kit MMR engine, RGR heads/cams Corn fed on E85! Built by me, tuned by Lito! (dyno video)

	(#8)
fazm The Collective is a way of life!!! Offline Posts: 6,048 Real Name: David Thanks: 1 Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Arizona Age: 29	03-26-2010 the best thing is the auto gt will smoke the auto camaro. more hp, less weight. the m6's will be closer, same power, less weight for the mustang, should be close 1st 400+rwhp stock longblock 410rwhp/459rwtq @ 12psi 12.29 @ 113 @ 9psi New car 2011 mustang v6 6speed manual. red again.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)