supercharged 5.0

**NealAtTheWheel5.0** · **supercharged 5.0 -** 09-24-2010

560rwhp 474 rwtq!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hguuak6yN4

**Scord** · 09-24-2010

Would rather drive my slow car then a ugly one :P

But like i said yesterday, those numbers are impressive.

**fazm** · 09-24-2010

the 5.0 is better looking all around inside and out, minus the rear

**6Stang99** · 09-25-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by fazm

the 5.0 is better looking all around inside and out, minus the rear

Agreed. All though even the rear end has grown on me a little bit.

**fazm** · 09-25-2010

Its definately grown on me but the 05-09 rear is still better

**NealAtTheWheel5.0** · 09-26-2010

yeah, I concur completely. I think the entire car looks better, and the interior is leaps and bounds above the 05-09 IMO. The only downside is the rear. So really, yeah I do think it's worth it. Much faster car, nicer interior, and better overall design. And I'm never gonna see the rear, only the people behind me are going to!

illegal1984 · 10-05-2010

Meh...call me a sucker for the original but aside from the interior I think it is aesthetically over done if not a bit of a rip. Not really a fan of the quasi-2007-2009ishGT500/Iwanttobeacamaroish front. The back is just ugly...The side is argueably better depending if you like the sleek muscular look of the 2010- versus the clean look of the 2005...The hood another camaro rip...imho though all of this kind of like asking do you like the 65' or the 67'...ftlog

Still though all in all its a way better driver's car then the camaro...I was sold in the camaro camp for my next car, but now the prospect of get an inferior vehicle simply for the look has me at odds...

torchRed'10 · 10-27-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by illegal1984

Meh...call me a sucker for the original but aside from the interior I think it is aesthetically over done if not a bit of a rip. Not really a fan of the quasi-2007-2009ishGT500/Iwanttobeacamaroish front. The back is just ugly...The side is argueably better depending if you like the sleek muscular look of the 2010- versus the clean look of the 2005...The hood another camaro rip...imho though all of this kind of like asking do you like the 65' or the 67'...ftlog

Still though all in all its a way better driver's car then the camaro...I was sold in the camaro camp for my next car, but now the prospect of get an inferior vehicle simply for the look has me at odds...

looks are subjective,I prefer the 2010's to the 05-09 by a large margin.

Then again I own a 2010, and surprisingly enough you guys prefer 05-09's, and consequently that's what you guys own as well.

**6Stang99** · 10-27-2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by illegal1984

Meh...call me a sucker for the original but aside from the interior I think it is aesthetically over done if not a bit of a rip. Not really a fan of the quasi-2007-2009ishGT500/Iwanttobeacamaroish front. The back is just ugly...The side is argueably better depending if you like the sleek muscular look of the 2010- versus the clean look of the 2005...The hood another camaro rip...imho though all of this kind of like asking do you like the 65' or the 67'...ftlog

Still though all in all its a way better driver's car then the camaro...I was sold in the camaro camp for my next car, but now the prospect of get an inferior vehicle simply for the look has me at odds...

I personally think the 2010's and 2011's look much better than the '05-'09's. The front is real sinister looking straight from the factory and the back bumper doesn't even bother me anymore. And the interior is absolutely amazing. In my personal opinion, other than Scrming's car the new Camaro's are plain old ugly, and I just don't see any of the Camaro's traits in the Mustang's design. And for the power the Camaro's have their track performance is a big let down due to an extremely "fat ass." Same thing is true for the new Challengers. But they sure do look sexy though...

**ABQstang89** · 10-27-2010

Absolutely love the motor.....but in my car.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

	(#1)
NealAtTheWheel5.0 *Collective Official Lame Sauce* Offline Posts: 4,129 Real Name: Neal Thanks: 8 Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Douglasville, GA Age: 26	supercharged 5.0 - 09-24-2010 560rwhp 474 rwtq! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hguuak6yN4 2011 Ford Mustang GT: 12.770 @ 114.000 MPH 396RWHP 390RWTQ 2011 Candy Red Metallic 5.0 GT Premium- Corsa Axle backs, Steeda intake/93 octane tune, JLT Oil Catch Can, 30% window tint, RTR side stripes, Hood spears, MGW short throw shifter, Tein S Springs, Eibach Pro shocks and struts, J&M lower control arms, J&M Adjustable Panhard Bar. My 2011 5.0 1/4 mile : 12.77 @ 114MPH My 2005 4.0 1/4 mile: 14.920 @ 93.11MPH SOLD!! Fast + Cheap = Not Reliable Cheap + Reliable = Not Fast Fast + Reliable = Not Cheap

	(#2)
Scord *Collective Pink Bite Sized Bastage* Offline Posts: 2,509 Real Name: Eric Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: San Jose, CA Age: 6	09-24-2010 Would rather drive my slow car then a ugly one :P But like i said yesterday, those numbers are impressive.

	(#3)
fazm The Collective is a way of life!!! Offline Posts: 6,048 Real Name: David Thanks: 1 Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Arizona Age: 29	09-24-2010 the 5.0 is better looking all around inside and out, minus the rear 1st 400+rwhp stock longblock 410rwhp/459rwtq @ 12psi 12.29 @ 113 @ 9psi New car 2011 mustang v6 6speed manual. red again.

	(#5)
fazm The Collective is a way of life!!! Offline Posts: 6,048 Real Name: David Thanks: 1 Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Arizona Age: 29	09-25-2010 Its definately grown on me but the 05-09 rear is still better 1st 400+rwhp stock longblock 410rwhp/459rwtq @ 12psi 12.29 @ 113 @ 9psi New car 2011 mustang v6 6speed manual. red again.

	(#6)
NealAtTheWheel5.0 *Collective Official Lame Sauce* Offline Posts: 4,129 Real Name: Neal Thanks: 8 Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Douglasville, GA Age: 26	09-26-2010 yeah, I concur completely. I think the entire car looks better, and the interior is leaps and bounds above the 05-09 IMO. The only downside is the rear. So really, yeah I do think it's worth it. Much faster car, nicer interior, and better overall design. And I'm never gonna see the rear, only the people behind me are going to! 2011 Ford Mustang GT: 12.770 @ 114.000 MPH 396RWHP 390RWTQ 2011 Candy Red Metallic 5.0 GT Premium- Corsa Axle backs, Steeda intake/93 octane tune, JLT Oil Catch Can, 30% window tint, RTR side stripes, Hood spears, MGW short throw shifter, Tein S Springs, Eibach Pro shocks and struts, J&M lower control arms, J&M Adjustable Panhard Bar. My 2011 5.0 1/4 mile : 12.77 @ 114MPH My 2005 4.0 1/4 mile: 14.920 @ 93.11MPH SOLD!! Fast + Cheap = Not Reliable Cheap + Reliable = Not Fast Fast + Reliable = Not Cheap

	(#7)
illegal1984 13-Second Member Offline Posts: 249 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Join Date: Oct 2007 Age: 28	10-05-2010 Meh...call me a sucker for the original but aside from the interior I think it is aesthetically over done if not a bit of a rip. Not really a fan of the quasi-2007-2009ishGT500/Iwanttobeacamaroish front. The back is just ugly...The side is argueably better depending if you like the sleek muscular look of the 2010- versus the clean look of the 2005...The hood another camaro rip...imho though all of this kind of like asking do you like the 65' or the 67'...ftlog Still though all in all its a way better driver's car then the camaro...I was sold in the camaro camp for my next car, but now the prospect of get an inferior vehicle simply for the look has me at odds... "Illegal" Tha Rogue Mustang SLY I "Destroyed" Dec. 2005- Nov. 2010 SLY II "Activated" Nov. 2011 4.0 for Life...

	(#10)
ABQstang89 Collective Junkie Offline Posts: 1,080 Real Name: Bryce Thanks: 0 Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico Age: 24	10-27-2010 Absolutely love the motor.....but in my car.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)